Church of England – Please Mind the Gap!

by Anne Foreman, Member of General Synod, Trustee of the Ozanne Foundation and former National Youth Adviser for the Church of England

If elected I will serve with the interested of parishes always in mind….”  So said my election address for the Church of England’s General Synod in 1999.  Now, as I approach my final few months on General Synod, having served on it for two very different Dioceses I have come to the conclusion that the gap between Synodical Structures and Pastoral Parishes is wider still.  The central structures have come up with a plethora of initiatives, such as Renewal and Reform, Simplification, Mission Shaped Church, Strategic funding for Resourcing and Planting new church communities, Estates Ministry, Everyday Faith.   However, questions need to be asked about how these fine sounding initiatives actually connect with existing neighbourhood schemes of care, advocacy and support? What is more, it often seems to be forgotten that parishes run on shoestring budgets, unlike the eye watering budgets behind these national projects!  The relevance of such initiatives to parishes is questionable and so the gap remains.  A gap brought sharply into focus by the response of the Institutional Church to Covid-19. 

In parishes you do what you can, where you are.  So, for the thousands of people going about their business of loving God and their neighbour there appeared to be little understanding at a national level of the impact of closing churches.  The physical building of the church, whether in a rural or urban setting, is often the focus from which service to the community springs and sustenance for its worshipping community sought. Suddenly it was not to be available. Despite lockdown first appearing on the scene in mid-March, it was not until the 9th September that anything like an empathetic recognition of the impact on community life by church closures came from the Archbishop of Canterbury, where he said…”worship is the work of God – not a social gathering – and gives the strength to love and serve.”  At last we had something that was more than a set of bureaucratic responses to matters of heart and soul.  I’m sure I’m not alone in finding that the many imaginative and creative ways of being church locally during this Pandemic has been in spite of national directives, (sorry guidelines), rather than in response to them.

Though General Synod representatives in our diocese work hard to communicate to parishes through contact with their deaneries, it’s a bit of an uphill task to enthuse people about stuff that does not appear relevant to the day to day concerns of their own parish life.  Concerns that have increased rather than diminished during this Pandemic.  Parish share still has to be found, Annual Meetings  still need to happen, faculties still have to be applied for.  Small wonder that the General Synod Report isn’t high on the Deanery Synod Agenda! 

In the main I think it’s due to time scale.  Although the internal workings and time scale of the Church may make sense to us in our synodical, gathered state, when we scatter…..when we go back to our parishes and out into the real world…..”to live and work to His praise and glory….” then the snails pace of action simply baffles people.  People, whether they be people in the pews or people on the fringe of church life, they simply don’t understand why things take so long. Structural  requirements render the gap too wide to be able to capture imaginations, let alone hearts, for Christ.

Measures at General Synod may have to be debated, supported by voting and enacted nationally, but they are lived out and implemented locally, through local relationships whose foundation is trust and loving God and neighbour.

Of course some General Synod stuff is actually highly relevant, in particular for example that arising from the Simplification Agenda, designed to make Parochial Church life easier. For instance the enabling of joint Councils for small Parochial Church Councils – sounds great and will be welcomed, but the legal rigmarole involved in making it happen is far from simple!  If the disciples on the road to Emmaus had been given some structural synodical stuff to read I don’t think for a moment that their hearts would have burned within them.!

Or take the long awaited publication of the Living in Love and Faith, LLF, materials.  Good people have worked long and hard, consulted widely and produced high quality materials.  And yet….and yet….it’s going to be another couple of years of conversations before any conclusions are reached, or not.  Dr Eeva John spoke of the need for scholarly work to connect with lived experience.  Speaking now as a former youth worker, for many (not all) young people, their lived experience includes sex.  While LLF conversations carry on we have a generation of young people who think the church just doesn’t get it as far as sex is concerned. We have a generation of young people for whom sex has become an alternative leisure activity.  So how then is the church to connect with them to model relationships, including same sex relationships, of fidelity, loyalty, kindness, delight and respect if it continues to say that marriage between a man and a woman is the only place that any physical expression of love or desire can happen, or indeed that sex is purely for procreation?

When I was still supervising full time Youth Workers and they were faced with a difficult issue  I would ask….”how and in what way will your decision enhance the lives of the young people you work with and for…”.? But that was then, and now for me the question is…..”How and in what way will the mission of the church be enhanced by the existing structures of the Church of England?”  The heart of the church beats in local communities and synodical structures need to uphold and strengthen the local.  More attention needs to be paid to minimising the gap between those structures and life as it is lived locally.

This entry was posted in Anne Foreman, Human Sexuality, Living in Love & Faith. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Church of England – Please Mind the Gap!

  1. Ann Partridge says:

    How true, well said and wise words.


  2. Caroline Baston says:

    Thank you, you understand what happens on the ground!


  3. Harriet Every says:

    Thank you Anne for your words of wisdom – there are certainly times when the gap feels very wide indeed!


  4. Froghole says:

    The decision to shutter the national Church in March (save online) and then the failure to ensure full re-opening in July (if not before) to allow parishes to recapture their financial breath (and to rehabilitate physical attendance) before the occurrence of a second wave may prove to be the most consequential blunders in the history of the Church, *at least* since the Reformation.

    Parish churches could easily have held socially distanced worship in churchyards during lockdown in order to preserve physical attendance. The failure to do so compounded the grievous error committed in March.

    These blunders were fateful enough. It is only now that the bench are starting to make serious comments impinging on public policy. This is far too late.

    There is a perception amongst the public that the Church (regardless of what work has been done on the ground in *certain* places) has been missing in action throughout the pandemic. That which has not been present can scarcely be missed if and when there is a return to the old normality.


    • Anthony Bush says:

      The focus on the building is misguided. The closure of churches was both necessary and gave an opportunity to outreach to the wider community which some churches welcomed with open arms. Well done the local churches that zoomed into homes and gave succour in a desperate situation. ⁹


  5. Peter C Bellenes says:

    The gap is wide open and has been growing over the years as parishes have struggled under the increasing burdens of an engorged bureaucracy not only at Church House but also at diocesan level. It’s so welcome to see voices raised in protest.


  6. Stewart Gefferys says:

    The gap is certainly getting wider. The idea that the administration is in charge and we the foot soldiers being led over the top has poinency at this Rememberence time.


  7. Mark Jackson says:

    I suspect what we are really witnessing is the death of the Church of England. It has become so centralised, it is significantly failing those struggling on the ground who are trying to keep an Anglican presence, let alone a Christian witness in communities with few resources . People are severely challenged where they are, let alone where they should be. How about preaching the Gospel?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s